Lewes
Flood
Action

 Lewes Flood Action logo

Flood Defences


The Background

 Flooded industrial estate, October 2000  Lewes breathed a sigh of relief in September 2002 when the Environment Agency lauched a flood defence strategy for the Ouse Valley.  Flood walls were to be raised to give improved standards of flood protection for major parts of the town.  Work would be complete by 2007 so that many previous flood victims would satisfy conditions recommended by the Association of British Insurers for continuation of cover.  If further research gave satisfactory results, flood banks would be lowered downstream of the town so that high tides could spill over agricultural land instead of flooding the town centre south of Phoenix Causeway (described as "downstream storage").

Rules for public investment in flood defence meant that the strategy was far from satisfactory to the people of Lewes.  Standards of protection in the town centre south of Phoenix Causeway were inadequate unless downstream storage was provided.  Moreover, no action was proposed for hard-hit areas such as Landpot, North Malling, Malling Deanery and Winterbourne.  Nevertheless, Lewes Flood Action welcomed the strategy as a first step, and started to campaign for improvements that could bring fairness and protect the prosperity and vitality of our community.

In January, East Sussex County Council agreed to fund its share of the Flood Defence Programme and detailed site investigations began in Lewes.  The future looked brighter.

In eary February, without publicity, the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) published a list of flood defence projects in England and Wales. The Ouse Valley strategy was listed as "unapproved".  Later in the month Elliot Morley, the Minister responsible for flood defence, announced that an additional £22 million funding had been made available "to allow new high-priority schemes to proceed in 2003-04, including Lewes, Bulverhythe in East Sussex, Sandwich and Ipswich - provided they meet the set criteria".

In mid-March, the position was clarified in a media release from the Environment Agency and by a letter from Sarah Nason, the Head of Flood Management Division in the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

It seems that the strategy for defence of the whole town submitted by the Environment Agency contained too many unknowns for DEFRA to accept it under the rules for public investment.  In other words, it did not meet the set criteria.  The Department are willing to accept a case for defence of Malling Brooks subject to clarification of minor points, but schemes for the other seven sections of the town that are at risk must be refined and resubmitted.  Under the present rules and policies applied to the information published in the Strategy, it is likely that only the Cliffe area will score sufficient priority points to secure public money, and then only for an inadequate scheme.

Lewes Flood Action is seeking an urgent meeting with the Environment Agency to find out:

  • why we are now in this potentially disastrous situation;
  • what is the new timetable for action
  • what must be done to secure effective flood defences for all who are at risk.

We will report the outcome, but meanwhile please write to the Minister responsible, asking him either to change the rules which pose such a great threat to the prosperity and vitality of our community, or to direct his officials to consider a plan that will protect the town as a whole rather than dividing it into haves and have-nots.

Elliott Morley MP
Parliamentary Secretary
Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs
Nobel House
17 Smith Square
London SW1P 3JR.

 
Flood Defences

 




This page last updated 4 February, 2007

Site donated and maintained by  
 Pagination Associates, Web Designers of Lewes